Author: Bill Ross | Published: May 23, 2026 | Updated: May 23, 2026 Key takeaways from the data: Total giving recovered from the 2022 inflation shock and set a current-dollar record in 2024. Stock-market gains lifted foundation assets and individual wealth, both of which drive contributions. The chart below shows where the curve sits today and where we expect it to go through 2028 if economic conditions stay roughly steady. The projection assumes nominal growth of about 4% per year, which is roughly in line with the long-run trend before the pandemic period distorted it. Real, inflation-adjusted growth is closer to 1.5% because so much of the apparent rebound is just dollar terms catching up with cost levels. Three forces matter most for the 2026-2028 forecast: equity markets, the upcoming wealth transfer from older Boomers, and changes to charitable deductibility (the universal deduction provision under recent budget legislation could add an estimated $9 to $11 billion annually if it passes in its expanded form).
“The headline number flatters the sector. When you strip out inflation and look at how many households actually wrote a check, generosity is contracting at the participation level even as totals rise. Nonprofits planning around the $592B figure without understanding that the wealthy donor mix is doing the heavy lifting will misallocate every dollar of acquisition spend.” – Emulent Strategy Team
The retention problem is the single most important constraint on nonprofit fundraising. Acquiring a new donor costs roughly seven times more than retaining an existing one, and the new-donor file has been bleeding for five straight years. The chart below splits overall retention from first-time retention because they tell very different stories. The 2020 and 2021 pandemic surge brought in millions of one-time crisis donors who never re-engaged. That cohort effectively poisoned the new-donor pool and dragged the average down. Stabilization near 14% reflects the Rogers diffusion floor: a hard core of one-time givers who treat charity as transactional and will not convert regardless of stewardship. The path forward runs through second-gift conversion within 90 days, immediate impact reporting, and segmented frequency that matches behavior. Generic mass appeals on a fixed monthly cadence are the primary cause of attrition, and the organizations that have moved off that model are seeing retention closer to the top-quartile benchmark of about 70%. If you are building out the email program that supports stewardship, our email marketing checklist walks through the welcome series and impact-reporting cadence that drives second gifts. DAF assets have grown so fast that they have become a structural feature of philanthropy, not a niche tool. Wealthy donors use them for tax efficiency, market timing, and estate planning. The chart shows the scale of the shift, with assets projected to reach roughly $500 billion by 2028. Three implications for marketing teams: First, your donation page needs a DAF giving option. Roughly 30% of nonprofits offer one today, and the channel grew 44% in 2025 alone. Second, your major gift stewardship needs to include wealth advisors as a secondary audience because they often recommend grants on behalf of their clients. Third, the payout rate of 25.3% means assets sitting in DAFs do move to charities, but selecting which ones requires brand visibility with affluent donors years before the grant decision.
“DAFs reward nonprofits that look credible to a wealth advisor reading a one-pager. That is a very different brand standard than the one your annual appeal optimizes for. We tell clients that the DAF channel is won by website signals, not by email subject lines.” – Emulent Strategy Team
Strong organizational positioning that holds up to advisor scrutiny is exactly what brand strategy services are built to deliver, and the credibility cues a wealth advisor looks for live on your website and impact reporting. GivingTuesday crossed $4 billion in the United States in 2025 with 38.1 million participants. The day continues to grow, but the strategic question has changed from “how do we participate” to “how do we convert participants into year-end repeat donors.” The signal worth acting on: 48% of GivingTuesday donors give again before year-end when they are properly stewarded, and 60% of gifts are under $100. This is a small-dollar acquisition event that doubles as your warmest list for the December push that follows. The mistake we see most often is treating it as a standalone campaign rather than the front end of a six-week cultivation sequence. Search interest for “GivingTuesday” has been declining for three years even as dollars rise, which means awareness from earned media is shrinking and you have to drive participation yourself through paid social, SMS, and email. The end-of-year window is also when nearly every other nonprofit is fighting for the same attention. We covered the broader implications of this attention shift in our look at how AI Overviews are reshaping how donors discover causes when they search. Generational giving differences are now wide enough that a single message and channel mix will underperform across every cohort. The chart shows average annual giving per donor, but the dollar figure understates the strategic gap because the channels, motivations, and frequency expectations are different across each group. Boomers remain the largest source of dollars but their share will decline through the late 2020s as wealth transfers to Gen X and Millennial heirs. Millennials pulled ahead of Gen X in average gift size and grew 22% between 2021 and 2024. Roughly 74% of Millennials self-identify as philanthropists, which is more than double the Boomer rate. Gen Z gives modest dollars today, but 61% say a creator’s involvement makes them more likely to donate, which means partnerships with trusted online voices belong in your acquisition mix. The channel split matters as much as the dollar split. 54% of Millennials give via smartphone versus 27% of Boomers. Direct mail still works for older donors and continues to lift online revenue from younger ones who treat it as a brand prompt rather than a response device.
“The instinct to age-segment a nonprofit list and send different messages to different generations is right. The execution most teams reach for is wrong. The variable that matters is not the copy. It is the channel mix and the timing of the second touchpoint, both of which require CRM segmentation most organizations have not built yet.” – Emulent Strategy Team
The 2025 benchmarks tell a clearer reallocation story than any single year has produced in a decade. Mobile messaging and DAF channels grew explosively, Facebook fundraising tools collapsed, and email held its lead as the workhorse channel for raising revenue per subscriber. The reallocation logic for 2026 is straightforward. SMS programs have moved from experimental to required infrastructure for any nonprofit raising more than $500K online. DAF integration is now table stakes on the donation page. Email holds steady at $2.40 raised per subscriber, but the gains came from list quality and personalization rather than higher send volume. Facebook fundraisers are a sunsetting product, and the time spent maintaining them is better invested in creator partnerships and Instagram or TikTok native content. Direct mail grew 9%, which is unspectacular but matters because the channel acts as a multiplier on online response from the same household. If your CRM and marketing stack cannot deliver behavioral SMS and personalized email triggered by giving history, you cannot capture the gains the data points to. Our digital marketing services team has helped nonprofit clients rebuild this layer so the data they collect actually feeds the campaigns they run. Almost every nonprofit has tried AI. Almost none have gotten real organizational lift from it yet. The gap between adoption and impact is now the central conversation in the sector, and the data is unambiguous. The 85-point gap between adoption and reported capability gain is the hallmark of a technology sitting in the trough of the Gartner hype cycle. Most teams use ChatGPT for first drafts and consider that “AI adoption,” which is why 76% lack a formal policy and only 4% have a training budget. The organizations that will pull ahead through 2028 are the ones treating AI as workflow redesign rather than as a faster autocomplete. Concrete moves that produce real lift: predictive scoring on lapsing donors, automated impact reporting drawn from program data, and personalized email variants generated and tested at scale.
“The biggest mistake we see is nonprofits buying AI features bolted onto legacy CRMs and expecting transformation. AI multiplies whatever system it sits on top of. If your donor data is fragmented, AI will produce fragmented recommendations faster. Clean the data, then add the model.” – Emulent Strategy Team
For teams building toward proper search visibility in an AI-mediated discovery environment, our AI SEO services cover the entity and citation work that gets your nonprofit cited in generative answers. Monthly giving is the most underappreciated long-term trend in nonprofit revenue. Recurring donors retain at 78% to 90% annually, give an average of $950 per year, and stay with organizations for roughly eight years. The chart shows recurring giving’s share of total online revenue approaching what we estimate as a practical saturation ceiling. The S-curve shape is doing real work in this projection. Monthly giving crossed the 16% Rogers diffusion threshold in 2018 and accelerated. Growth is slowing now because the remaining one-time givers represent tribute gifts, event response, and an acquisition floor that resists conversion to recurring commitment. The 40% ceiling is not a hard limit. It is the point past which marginal effort to convert one-time donors to monthly produces diminishing returns. Most organizations have not built the donation-page defaults, upgrade ladders, and stewardship sequences required to capture even today’s available share, let alone the projected 2028 number. The fastest single change with the largest measurable lift remains preselecting monthly giving on the donation form, which lifts conversion of new monthly donors by up to 30%. A donation page that holds up to scrutiny on mobile, accepts DAFs, defaults to monthly, and renders cleanly in under two seconds is the single highest-ROI asset your organization owns. Building or rebuilding that page is what our website design services are most often hired for in the nonprofit sector. The numbers in this report describe a sector where the easy wins are gone. Total giving is at record levels because wealthier donors are giving more, not because more people are giving. Channel performance is splitting sharply between accelerators and laggards. Donor stewardship has moved from a soft skill to the core economic engine of every fundraising program. Our team works with nonprofits to translate the trends in this report into the campaign architecture, donation experience, and content strategy that actually moves second-gift rates, recurring revenue, and major gift pipelines. If you are planning your 2026 strategy and want help turning the projections above into a concrete plan for your organization, contact the Emulent team and we will work through it with you. Nonprofit Fundraising and Marketing Trends and 2026-2028 Projections

Where is total US charitable giving headed through 2028?
What is driving the donor retention cliff?
Why are donor-advised funds now central to your fundraising stack?
How do you turn GivingTuesday into a stewardship engine instead of a one-day spike?
What does each generation want from your nonprofit?
Which channels deserve more of your 2026 budget?
Where should AI actually fit in your nonprofit’s workflow?
How will recurring giving reshape your revenue model by 2028?
Where Emulent fits into your nonprofit marketing plan